Comparison of the effect of two disinfectants on the independent waterway disinfection of a periodontal ultrasonic scaler / 口腔疾病防治

Objective @#To compare the disinfection effect of 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide and 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectants in the independent waterway of a periodontal ultrasonic scaler to provide a reference for clinical waterway disinfection management in stomatology departments.@*Methods @#The 18 ultrasonic scalers were randomly divided into 3 groups of 6 units: the control group, experimental group 1 (3% hydrogen peroxide disinfectant group), and experimental group 2 (500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group). The replaceable parts of the independent waterway pipes of the 3 groups of ultrasonic scalers were replaced, and the water supply was supplied with sterile distilled water (DW). In the control group, special treatment was not applied to the nonreplaceable pipe part. In experimental group 1, the 3% hydrogen peroxide was used to disinfect nonreplaceable pipelines. In experimental group 2, the nonreplaceable part was disinfected with the 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant. The water sample was taken from the outlet of the scaler working part in the three groups for monitoring before disinfection, immediately after disinfection and 10 consecutive days after disinfection. Bacteria in the water samples were cultured for the colony counts. Then, the bacterial culture data were compared between groups. The qualified criterion of the water sample was that the number of bacterial colonies was less than or equal to 100 CFU/mL. After disinfection, a bacterial species mass spectrometry identification analysis was carried out when the number of bacterial colonies in each group exceeded the standard for the first time. Biofilms from the inner wall of the tube in the three groups were observed under an electron microscope on the 10th day after disinfection.@*Results @#There were no significant differences between the three groups before disinfection (F = 2.549, P = 0.111). The number of bacterial colonies in the spout of 6 scalers in the control group all exceeded the standard, and three kinds of bacteria were cultured: Sphingomonas melonis, Herbaspirillum huttiense, and Ralstonia pickettii. Compared with those in the control group, the number of bacterial colonies in experimental group 1 decreased significantly for 1-2 days after disinfection (P<0.05) and reached the standard. On the 3rd day after disinfection, the number of bacterial colonies of group 1 increased rapidly and exceeded the standard, and three kinds of bacteria were cultured: Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum huttiense, and Ralstonia pickettii. For experimental group 2, the number of bacterial colonies decreased significantly compared to the control group on Days 1 to 6 after disinfection, but the number of bacterial colonies increased slightly from the 7th day after disinfection and exceeded the standard. Two kinds of bacteria were cultured: Herbaspirillum huttiense and Ralstonia pickettii. The average number of bacterial colonies 10-day after disinfection in experimental group 2 was lower than that in experimental group 1(P<0.001). Under an electron microscope, the biofilm thickness of the two experimental groups was significantly lower than that of the control group. @* Conclusion @# There is water pollution in the independent waterway of a periodontal ultrasound scaler. Three percent hydrogen peroxide and 500 mg/L chlorine disinfectant both have effective disinfection effects on the outlet water of scalers, and the effect of 500 mg/L chlorine disinfectant is better than that of 3% hydrogen peroxide. The use of 3% hydrogen peroxide to disinfect periodontal ultrasound scaler-independent waterways is recommended for disinfection every other day, and disinfection once a week is recommended for the use of 500 mg/L chlorine disinfectant.

O uso do ozônio na desinfecção de superfícies: revisão integrativa / El uso de ozono para la desinfección de superficies: revisión integradora / Ozone use in surface disinfection: an integrative review

Resumo Objetivo Analisar as evidências científicas com relação à eficácia do uso do ozônio para desinfecção de superfícies a partir de uma revisão integrativa de literatura. Métodos Realizou-se busca nos bancos de dados eletrônicos: SciELO, MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Sciense Direct. Foram analisados onze artigos, publicados no período de janeiro de 2010 a agosto de 2021. Todos empregaram o modelo de investigação experimental laboratorial e alcançaram diferentes níveis de desinfecção pelo O3, no entanto, com variadas superfícies e produtos testados, além de diferentes procedimentos metodológicos. Resultados A maioria apresentou taxa de inibição pelo O3 igual ou superior a 90%, comprovando assim a eficácia desse agente como desinfetante de superfícies, mesmo havendo variações de valores dos parâmetros como, concentração e tempo de exposição, em todos os artigos selecionados, até mesmo nos que não comprovaram a eficácia do O3. Conclusão Essa revisão evidencia o poder inibitório que o O3 possui sobre diferentes patógenos, mesmo que haja variáveis nos fatores utilizados para esse fim, destacando-o frente a outros desinfetantes. Corrobora, assim, na composição de protocolos de desinfecção de superfícies e na tomada de decisão entre gestores e comissões acerca de tecnologias saneantes.

Resumen Objetivo Analizar las evidencias científicas con respecto a la eficacia del uso del ozono para la desinfección de superficies a partir de una revisión integradora de la literatura. Métodos Se realizó una búsqueda en los bancos de datos electrónicos: SciELO, MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Sciense Direct. Se analizaron 11 artículos, publicados en el período de enero de 2010 a agosto 2021. Todos utilizaron el modelo de investigación experimental laboratorial y obtuvieron distintos niveles de desinfección por O3, pero utilizando distintas superficies y productos, además de distintos procedimientos metodológicos. Resultados La mayoría presentó una tasa de inhibición por O3 igual o superior al 90 %, lo que comprueba la eficacia de ese agente como desinfectante de superficies, aunque existan variaciones en los valores de los parámetros, como concentración y tiempo de exposición, en todos los artículos seleccionados, incluso en los que no se comprobó la eficacia del O3. Conclusión Esta revisión evidencia el poder inhibitorio que el O3 presenta ante distintos patógenos, aunque existan variables en los factores utilizados para esa finalidad, por lo que se destaca ante otros desinfectantes. De esta forma, se confirma la composición de protocolos de desinfección de superficies y la toma de decisiones entre gestores y comisiones sobre tecnologías de desinfección.

Abstract Objective To analyze the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of using ozone to disinfect surfaces based on an integrative literature review. Methods A search was carried out in the SciELO, MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Science Direct databases. Eleven articles published January 2010 to August 2021 were analyzed. All employed the experimental laboratory research model and achieved different levels of disinfection by O3, however, with varied surfaces and products tested, in addition to different methodological procedures. Results The majority had an inhibition rate by O3 equal to or greater than 90%, thus proving the effectiveness of this agent as a surface disinfectant, even with variations in parameter values such as concentration and exposure time, in all selected articles, even those that did not prove the effectiveness of O3. Conclusion This review shows the inhibitory power that O3 has on different pathogens, even if there are variables in the factors used for this purpose, highlighting it in front of other disinfectants. Thus, it corroborates the composition of surface disinfection protocols and decision-making among managers and committees about sanitizing technologies.

Aislamiento de Acanthamoeba spp. en salas cerradas de un hospital de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina / Isolation of Acanthamoeba spp. in closed rooms of a hospital in Buenos Aires province, Argentina

Resumen Las amebas de vida libre (AVL) son protozoos ubicuos con cuatro géneros patógenos para el ser humano: Acanthamoeba, Naegleria, Balamuthia, y Sappinia. Acanthamoeba puede actuar como reservorio de microorganismos (endosimbiontes), por lo cual, en medio hospitalario, implicaría un riesgo para la transmisión de bacterias, virus y hongos intranosocomiales. Se investigó la presencia de AVL, con énfasis en Acanthamoeba spp., en un hospital pediátrico de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se colectaron 22 muestras de lavamanos e incubadoras en salas de Neonatología y Terapia Intensiva, las que fueron cultivadas a 37 y 42 °C. Los aislados fueron identificados molecularmente. El 63,64% de las muestras presentaron Acanthamoeba spp. Esta investigación representa el primer estudio realizado en la Argentina sobre la detección de Acanthamoeba spp. en salas cerradas de un hospital. Su presencia es una señal de alarma y resulta un blanco útil para investigar posibles reservorios de microorganismos patógenos en ambientes hospitalarios.

Abstract Free-living amoebae (FLA) are ubiquitous protozoa with four pathogenic genera for humans: Acanthamoeba, Naegleria, Balamuthia, and Sappinia. Acanthamoeba can act as a reservoir of microorganisms (endosymbionts), for which reason, in a hospital environment, it would imply a risk for transmission of nosocomial bacteria, viruses and fungi. The presence of AVL, with emphasis on Acanthamoeba spp., was investigated in a pediatric hospital. Twenty-two samples were collected from sinks and incubators in Neonatology and Intensive Care rooms, which were cultured at 37 and 42 °C. The isolates found were molecularly identified. A total of 63.64% of the samples presented Acanthamoeba spp. This research represents the first study in Argentina on the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. in closed rooms of a hospital. Its presence is an alarm signal, and it is a useful target to investigate possible reservoirs of pathogenic microorganisms in hospital environments.

Resumo As amebas de vida livre (AVL) são protozoários ubíquos com quatro gêneros patogênicos para o ser humano: Acanthamoeba, Naegleria, Balamuthia, e Sappinia. Acanthamoeba pode atuar como um reservatório de microrganismos (endossimbiontes), e portanto, em um ambiente hospitalar, representaria um risco de transmissão de bactérias, vírus e fungos intra-nosocomiais. A presença de AVL, com em Acanthamoeba spp. em um hospital pediátrico da província de Buenos Aires, Argentina, foi investigada. Vinte e duas amostras foram coletadas em lavatórios e incubadoras em Salas de Neonatologia e Cuidados Intensivos, cultivadas a 37 e 42 °C. Os isolados foram identificadas molecularmente. Foram encontradas Acanthamoeba spp. em 63,64% das amostras. Esta investigação representa o primeiro estudo realizado na Argentina sobre a detecção de Acanthamoeba spp. em salas fechadas de um hospital. A sua presença é um sinal de alarme e um alvo para investigar possíveis reservatórios de microrganismos patogênicos em ambientes hospitalares.

Use and management of disinfectants by dentists in San Luis Potosi, Mexico, during the covid-19 pandemic / Uso y manejo de desinfectantes por odontólogos de San Luis Potosí, México durante la pandemia covid-19

Introduction: Chlorine, ethyl alcohol, and quaternary ammonium are disinfectants with antiviral activity against SARS-Cov2. However, there are no previous reports of their use and handling for cleaning and disinfection in dental offices. Objetive: To determine the use and management of disinfectants in critical and non-critical areas used by dentists in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: A validated cross-sectional survey was applied online to 100 dentists in San Luis Potosí between February and June 2021. Participants were informed about the handling of personal data according to the standard DOF regulations (DOF 07-05-2010). Results: A total of 100 dentists were included in the study, 63% female and 37% male, with a mean age of 26 years. The most widely used disinfectants during the pandemic in critical areas were Lysol® and 0.1% sodium hypochlorite in non-critical areas. Eighty-five percent of dentists know the adverse effects of inappropriate use of disinfectants, 72% did not have any sign or symptom associated with the use of disinfectants. The most used protection barrier was gloves (97%). Sixty-seven per cent of dentists disposed of disinfectant waste down the drain. Conclusion: Sodium hypochlorite and quaternary ammonium compounds and/or ethanol are used to clean non-critical and critical areas in dental offices. However, appropriate measures for their management are not adopted. It is necessary to implement educational strategies to improve the use and management of disinfectants in dental practice.

Introducción: Cloro, alcohol etílico y amonio cuaternario son desinfectantes que muestran actividad antiviral contra el SARS-Cov2, sin embargo, no existen reportes previos de su uso y manejo para la limpieza y desinfección en clínicas dentales. Objetivo: Determinar el uso y manejo de los desinfectantes en áreas críticas y no críticas empleados por los odontólogos en San Luis Potosí durante la COVID-19. Material y Métodos: Encuesta transversal validada y aplicada on-line a 100 odontólogos de San Luis Potosí durante febrero-junio 2021. Se informó a los participantes sobre el manejo de datos personales de acuerdo a la norma (DOF 05-07-2010). Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 100 odontólogos, 63% del sexo femenino y 37% del sexo masculino, con una edad promedio de 26 años. Los desinfectantes más utilizados durante la pandemia en las áreas críticas fueron el Lysol® y el hipoclorito de sodio al 0.1% en áreas no críticas. El 85% de los odontólogos conocen los efectos adversos del uso inadecuado de los desinfectantes, 72% no tuvieron algún signo o síntoma asociado al uso de desinfectantes. La barrera de protección más utilizada fueron los guantes (97%). El 67% de los odontólogos eliminó los desechos de desinfectantes por la coladera. Conclusión: Para la limpieza de las áreas no críticas y críticas en las clínicas dentales se utilizan el hipoclorito de Sodio y compuestos de amonio cuaternario y/o etanol, sin embargo, no se utilizan las medidas adecuadas para su manejo. Es necesario implementar estrategias educativas para mejorar el uso y manejo de desinfectantes en la práctica dental.

Tratamiento de las intoxicaciones agudas por desinfectantes durante la COVID-19 / Treatment of acute poisoning by disinfectants during COVID-19

Introducción: El uso de productos de limpieza, a expensa de los desinfectantes se ha incrementado por la población mundial como consecuencia de la COVID-19. El manejo frecuente de estas sustancias químicas por las personas puede ocasionar cuadros de intoxicaciones agudas. Esta situación se evidencia en los reportes emitidos por los centros antitóxicos del orbe, donde consta el aumento en el número de consultas toxicológicas. Objetivo: Describir el tratamiento de las intoxicaciones agudas por desinfectantes durante la COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica acerca del tratamiento de las intoxicaciones agudas por desinfectantes durante la COVID-19. Se incluyeron artículos escritos en español, inglés y portugués. Además, se abordaron aspectos relacionados con las intoxicaciones agudas por el uso de desinfectantes, el cuadro clínico, así como elementos del diagnóstico y tratamiento de las intoxicaciones agudas por estas sustancias químicas. Conclusiones: Las intoxicaciones agudas por hipoclorito de sodio y geles hidroalcohólicos son las más frecuentes en la población durante la COVID-19 en proporción con el uso de estos productos químicos. La atención médica precoz, eficaz y oportuna disminuirá la posibilidad de aparición de complicaciones. El tratamiento de estás intoxicaciones agudas está en relación con los síntomas y signos que presentan los pacientes al ser recibidos en los servicios de urgencia(AU)

Introduction: The use of cleaning products, at the expense of disinfectants, has increased by the world population as a consequence of COVID-19. Frequent handling of these chemical substances by people can cause acute poisoning. This situation is evidenced in the reports issued by the world's anti-toxic centers, where the increase in the number of toxicological consultations is recorded. Objective: To describe the treatment of acute poisoning by disinfectants during COVID-19. Methods: A literature review on the treatment of acute poisoning by disinfectants during COVID-19 was carried out. Articles written in Spanish, English and Portuguese were included. In addition, aspects related to acute poisoning due to the use of disinfectants, the clinical condition, as well as elements of the diagnosis and treatment of acute poisoning by these chemical substances were addressed. Conclusions: Acute poisoning by sodium hypochlorite and hydroalcoholic gels are the most frequent in the population during COVID-19 in proportion to the use of these chemical products. Early, effective and timely medical care will reduce the possibility of complications. The treatment of these acute intoxications is related to the symptoms and signs presented by patients when they are received in the emergency services(AU)

Desinfecção de hubs e conectores de cateteres intravenosos: revisão de escopo / Desinfección de hubs y conectores de catéteres intravenosos: revisión de alcance / Disinfection of intravenous catheter hubs and connectors: scoping review

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar métodos de desinfecção de hubs e conectores sem agulha dos cateteres intravenosos em pacientes hospitalizados e verificar a efetividade das intervenções para a prevenção de infecções de corrente sanguínea associada a cateter intravenoso. Método: revisão de escopo seguindo as recomendações de Joanna Briggs Institute. Busca realizada em bases de dados eletrônicas Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Base de Dados Enfermagem e Bibliografía Nacional en Ciencias de la Salud Argentina, e estudos indicados por experts. A busca foi atemporal até setembro de 2020. Protocolo registrado na Open Science Framework. Resultados: foram incluídos 27 estudos, sendo que cinco foram Guidelines e 22 foram artigos publicados em periódicos. Existe grande variedade de métodos de desinfecção de hubs e de conectores. Para a desinfecção ativa, foram indicados Gluconato de Clorexedina, Isopropanol e Iodopovedina; para a desinfecção passiva, Gluconato de Clorexedina e Isopropanol. A quantidade do agente desinfetante variou de 0,25 mL a 0,6 mL. O tempo de fricção na desinfecção ativa variou de cinco segundos a 30 segundos, e o tempo de contato na desinfecção passiva variou de três minutos a sete dias. O tempo de secagem de agentes desinfetantes foi superior a cinco segundos. Conclusão: verifica-se variedade de métodos de desinfecção; no entanto, não há consenso sobre a melhor indicação. Necessita-se de estudos que evidenciem a quantidade de desinfetante, a pressão e o tempo de fricção e o tempo de secagem. Pesquisas com práticas de desinfecção utilizadas no Brasil e ensaios clínicos randomizados são necessários.

RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar los métodos de desinfección de los hubs y conectores sin aguja de los catéteres intravenosos en pacientes hospitalizados, y verificar la eficacia de las intervenciones para la prevención de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a los catéteres intravenosos. Método: revisión del alcance siguiendo las recomendaciones del Instituto Joanna Briggs. Búsqueda realizada en las bases de datos electrónicas Pubmed, Embase, Biblioteca Cochrane, Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud, Base de Datos de Enfermería y Bibliografía Nacional en Ciencias de la Salud Argentina, y estudios indicados por expertos. La búsqueda era atemporal hasta septiembre de 2020. Protocolo registrado en el Open Science Framework. Resultados: se incluyeron 27 estudios, cinco de los cuales eran Guidelines y 22 eran artículos publicados en revistas. Existe una gran variedad de métodos para la desinfección de hubs y conectores, siendo el gluconato de clorhexedina, el isopropanol y la yodopovedina los indicados para la desinfección activa, y el gluconato de clorhexedina y el isopropanol para la desinfección pasiva. La cantidad del agente desinfectante osciló entre 0,25 mL y 0,6 mL. El tiempo de fricción para la desinfección activa osciló entre cinco segundos y 30 segundos, y el tiempo de contacto para la desinfección pasiva osciló entre tres minutos y siete días. El tiempo de secado de los agentes desinfectantes fue superior a cinco segundos. Conclusión: se comprueba la variedad de métodos de desinfección, aunque no hay consenso sobre la mejor indicación. Se necesitan estudios que evidencien la cantidad de desinfectante, la presión y el tiempo de fricción, y el tiempo de secado. Es necesario investigar las prácticas de desinfección utilizadas en Brasil y realizar ensayos clínicos aleatorios.

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify disinfection methods for intravenous catheter hubs and needleless connectors in hospitalized patients, as well as to verify the effectiveness of the interventions to prevent bloodstream infections associated with intravenous catheters. Method: a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. The search was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Base de Dados Enfermagem and Bibliografía Nacional en Ciencias de la Salud Argentina, as well as in studies indicated by experts. The search was conducted until September 2020. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework. Results: a total of 27 studies were included, of which five were Guidelines and 22 were articles published in journals. There is a significant variety of disinfection methods for hubs and connectors. Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Isopropanol and Povidone-iodine were indicated for active disinfection; and Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Isopropanol, for passive disinfection. The disinfectant volume varied from 0.25 mL to 0.6 mL. Friction time in active disinfection ranged from five to 30 seconds, and contact time in passive disinfection varied from three minutes to seven days. The disinfectants' drying time was over five minutes. Conclusion: a variety of disinfection methods is verified, although with no consensus on the best indication. Studies that show the amount of disinfectant, pressure, friction and drying time are required. There is a need to conduct research studies with disinfection practices used in Brazil and randomized clinical trials.

A retrospective review of calls to the Poisons Information Helpline of the Western Cape during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa

Background: Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, poison centres worldwide have reported an increase in exposures to chemicals used for infection prevention. Increased availability and use could lead to an increase in exposures. Potential effects on a South African Poison Information Helpline were unknown, therefore a study was performed to describe changes in call volume and profile of poison exposures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on an observational database of telephone enquiries. All human-related poisoning exposure call data collected from 01 March to 31 August during 2018, 2019 and 2020 were extracted and analyzed. Summary statistics were used to describe all variables. Results: The total number of calls were 5137, 5508, and 5181 in 2018, 2019, 2020, respectively. The monthly call number during 2020 was mostly less than in 2019. More calls were received from the public calls (39.4% vs 33.1%) and for accidental exposures (65.6% vs 62.3%) increased during 2020 compared to 2019. Exposures to pharmaceuticals decreased by 14.8% from 2019 to 2020, while exposures to eucalyptus oil more than doubled from 21 in 2019 to 43 during 2020. Exposures to antiseptics and disinfectants increased by 60.4%, mainly due to hand sanitizers exposure which showed a 26-fold increase from 2019 (n = 6) to 2020 (n = 156). Conclusion: A change in the profile of poison exposures was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdown regulations and greater availability of antiseptics and disinfectants probably led to the increase in exposures. Although symptoms were mostly mild, the public should be educated on safe storage and proper use of all chemicals.

Molecular characterization of mycotoxin-producing Aspergillus parasiticus and sensitivity pattern to different disinfectants

Aims@#The study was aimed to isolate and characterize the mycotoxin-producing filamentous Aspergillus parasiticus from the feed samples. The sensitivity pattern of the isolates was assessed against different disinfectants.@*Methodology and results@#Fifty different feed samples were screened for A. parasiticus isolation. Isolates were subjected to macroscopic and microscopic characterization. Polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the isolates at the genomic level. Mycotoxin producing potential of the isolates was assessed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). To quantify the toxins, high performance liquid (HPLC) was employed. The antifungal potential of disinfectants was determined by the well diffusion method followed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) calculation. Out of twenty isolates of A. parasiticus, 11(55%) isolates were observed positive for toxin production. Three toxigenic isolates (AspP2, AspP4 and AspP8) were selected to evaluate their susceptibility against disinfectants by well diffusion method. AspP2 produced maximum (5.90 ng/mL) toxin, followed by AspP4 (3.11 ng/mL) and AspP8 (18.47 ng/mL). Terralin showed maximum fungicidal activity with 29.66 ± 8.08 mm zone of inhibition at 0.42 μg/mL MIC. Hypochlorite and Instru Star showed 99% disinfection with 30, 60 and 90 min contact time (6 mean log reduction) for all A. parasiticus isolates. Alpha Guard inhibited growth after 15 min contact time for all the isolates.@*Conclusion, significance and impact of study@#This study provides data indicating the contamination of feed samples with mycotoxin-producing A. parasiticus isolates and their sensitivity against commercially available disinfectants. Use of these disinfectants in appropriate concentrations and time could help prevent the contamination of food, feed and healthcare settings with the fungal species.

Efectividad en reducción de unidades formadoras de colonias con soluciones desinfectantes en tina ultrasónica / Effectiveness in reducing colony forming units with disinfecting solutions in an ultrasonic vat

En la práctica clínica, los odontólogos se encuentran expuestos al riesgo de infecciones, que se transmiten a través de instrumentos contaminados con exudados. Instrumentos en contacto con el personal deben estar esterilizados o sometidos a un proceso de desinfección. Se realizó un estudio transversal-prospectivo a 30 pacientes, de los que se tomaron tres muestras con espejos estériles, pasando por fondo de saco, carrillos y lengua, después las muestras se desinfectaron, se realizó el hisopado de cada espejo y se incubó en agar tripticaseína-soya (TSA) 24 horas a 37 oC. Pasadas 24 horas se realizaron diluciones en tubos Eppendorf, y se sembraron en cajas de Petri con agar sangre, se incubaron por 48 horas a 37 oC; se contabilizaron las unidades formadoras de colonias (UFC) y registraron para su análisis. Al obtener los resultados se encontró que ID 213 tuvo mayor reducción con una media = 62.5 en comparación con Zeta 1 Ultra, media = 89.23, y control, media = 164.50, de igual manera se observó una diferencia en reducción de UFC/mL entre ID 213 con respecto a Zeta 1 Ultra con significancia de 0.012. Ambos desinfectantes resultaron efectivos, pero se estableció que ID 213 utilizando la tina ultrasónica resulta más efectivo en la reducción de UFC, que Zeta 1 Ultra (AU)

In clinical practice, dentists are exposed to the risk of infections, which are transmitted through instruments contaminated with exudates. Instruments in contact with personnel must be sterilized or subjected to a disinfection process. A cross-sectional-prospective study was carried out in 30 patients. From which three samples were taken with sterile mirrors, passing through cul-de-sac, cheeks and tongue, later the samples were disinfected with disinfectants, each mirror was swabbed and incubated in TSA 24 hours at 37 oC. After 24 hours, dilutions were made in Eppendorf tubes, and they were seeded in Petri dishes with blood agar, they were incubated 48 hours at 37 oC; CFUs were accounted for and recorded for analysis. When obtaining the results, it was found that ID 213 had a greater reduction with mean = 62.5 compared to Zeta 1 Ultra mean = 89.23 and control mean = 164.50, in the same way a difference in reduction of CFU/mL was observed between ID 213 with respect to Zeta 1 Ultra with significance of 0.012. Both disinfectants were effective but it was established that ID 213 using the ultrasonic tub is more effective in reducing CFU, than Zeta 1 Ultra (AU)

Resistencia Bacteriana a desinfectantes en áreas comunes de oficinas / Bacterial Resistance to disinfectants in common office areas

Introducción. El uso de diferentes agentes químicos para la atenuación, tratamiento y control de microorganismos ha venido aumentando, la falta de control y conocimiento de estos productos, está generando un cambio del genoma en los microorganismos, provocando resistencia a concentraciones normales de biocidas. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática sobre la resistencia bacteriana a los desinfectantes en áreas comunes de oficina. Métodos: Revisión sistemática de bases de datos; Scielo, Elsevier, Pubmed y ACS Publications research, y fuentes secundarias como la OPS (organización Panamericana de la Salud) y la OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud), entre otras, utilizando términos tales como; Resistencia bacteriana, desinfección, enfermedades laborales o profesionales y resistencia a desinfectantes. Resultados: Enterobacter sp. resistente a Amonio Cuaternario (QAC), desinfectantes a base de halógeno y formaldehído al 37%; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 71% de los aislamientos multirresistentes a los antibióticos, 43% susceptibilidad reducida a QAC, a triclosan (TC) y Benzalconio (BAC), y 24 aislamientos resistentes a agentes antimicrobianos. M. massiliense BRA 100 susceptible a ortoftaldehido (OPA), ácido peracético (PA), y a altas concentraciones de glutaraldehído. Aislamientos clínicos de cepas multirresistentes a antibióticos como: MRSA, Enterococcus sp. y Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 52% y 38% cepas fueron resistentes a compuestos de amonio cuaternario y fenol, respectivamente. Conclusiones: La presencia de microorganismos resistente en lugares comunes como; pisos, interruptores de luz, manijas de puertas, escritorios y sillas, entre otras, enuncia un problema de salud pública que se debe comenzar a tratar, cambiando las metodologías utilizadas para la desinfección, y otras medidas de control y prevención.

Introduction. The use of different chemical agents for the attenuation, treatment and control of microorganisms has been increasing, the lack of control and knowledge of these products is generating a change in the genome in microorganisms, causing resistance to normal concentrations of biocides. Objective: To carry out a systematic review on bacterial resistance to disinfectants in common office areas. Methods: Systematic review of databases; Scielo, Elsevier, Pubmed and ACS Publications research, and secondary sources such as PAHO (Pan American Health Organization) and WHO (World Health Organization), among others, using terms such as; Bacterial resistance, disinfection, occupational or professional diseases and resistance to disinfectants. Results: Enterobacter sp.: resistant to Quaternary Ammonium (QAC), halogen-based disinfectants and 37% formaldehyde; Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 71% of isolates multiresistant to antibiotics, 43% reduced susceptibility to QAC, triclosan (TC) and Benzalkonium (BAC), and 24 isolates resistant to antimicrobial agents. M. massiliense BRA 100 susceptible to orthophthaldehyde (OPA), peracetic acid (PA), and high concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Clinical isolates of multiresistant strains to antibiotics such as: MRSA, Enterococcus sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 52% and 38% strains were resistant to quaternary ammonium and phenol compounds, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of resistant microorganisms in common places such as; floors, light switches, door handles, desks and chairs, among others, enunciates a public health problem that must begin to be addressed, changing the methodologies used for disinfection, and other control and prevention measures.

Decontamination of stainless-steel bowls with 80% (w/v) alcohol for 30 s and 60 s: randomized experimental study / Descontaminação de bacias inoxidáveis com álcool 80% (p/v) por 30 s e 60 s: estudo experimental randomizado / Descontaminación de palanganas de acero inoxidable con alcohol al 80% (p/v) durante 30 s y 60 s: estudio experimental aleatorizado

Objective: to compare the efficacy of 80% (w/v) alcohol, rubbed for 30 and 60 seconds, in the manual processing of stainless-steel wash bowls, after cleaning with running water and neutral detergent. Method: experimental study conducted in a hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, on 50 bowls randomly divided into two groups of 25 bowls each for interventions of 30 and 60 seconds of rubbing with 80% (w/v) alcohol. Results: based on the microbiological analyses collected, before and after the interventions for both groups, partial efficacy of the disinfectant was observed even when extending rubbing time. In both groups, there was a higher prevalence of survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 14 strains that were resistant to carbapenems, being, specifically, 11 to imipenem and three to meropenem. Conclusion: stainless-steel bed wash bowls decontaminated for reuse by 80% (w/v) alcohol, after cleaning with running water and neutral detergent, showed to be reservoirs of hospital pathogens. The use of bed wash bowls for patients with intact skin would not have worrying consequences, but considering those with non-intact skin and the contamination of professionals' hands, the results in this study justify the search for other decontamination methods or the adoption of disposable bed baths.

Objetivo: comparar a eficácia do álcool 80% (p/v), friccionado por 30 e 60 segundos, no processamento manual de bacias de banho em aço inoxidável, após limpeza com água corrente e detergente neutro. Método: estudo experimental realizado em hospital do estado de São Paulo, Brasil, com 50 bacias randomicamente distribuídas em dois grupos de 25, para as intervenções de 30 e 60 segundos de fricção com álcool 80% (p/v). Resultados: das análises microbiológicas coletadas, antes e após as intervenções para os dois grupos, verificou-se eficácia parcial do desinfetante, mesmo ampliando o tempo de fricção. Em ambos os grupos, observou-se maior prevalência de sobrevida de Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 cepas resistentes a carbapenens, especificamente, 11 ao imipenen e três ao meropenen. Conclusão: bacias de banho no leito em aço inoxidável, descontaminadas para reuso com álcool 80% (p/v), após limpeza com água corrente e detergente neutro, apresentam-se como reservatórios de patógenos hospitalares. O uso das bacias de banho no leito para pacientes com pele íntegra não teria consequências preocupantes, mas para aqueles com pele não íntegra e pensando na contaminação das mãos dos profissionais, os resultados dessa pesquisa justificam a busca de outros métodos de descontaminação ou a adoção de banho de leito descartável.

Objetivo: comparar la eficacia del alcohol al 80% (p/v), frotado durante 30 y 60 segundos, en el proceso de descontaminación manual de palanganas de baño de acero inoxidable, después de lavarlas con agua corriente y detergente neutro. Método: estudio experimental realizado en un hospital del estado de São Paulo, Brasil, con 50 palanganas divididas aleatoriamente en dos grupos de 25, para intervenciones de 30 y 60 segundos de frotamiento con alcohol al 80% (p/v). Resultados: los análisis microbiológicos recolectados, antes y después de las intervenciones para ambos grupos, demostraron efectividad parcial del desinfectante, incluso cuando se extendió el tiempo de fricción. En ambos grupos, se observó una mayor prevalencia de supervivencia de Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 cepas resistentes a carbapenemas, específicamente 11 a imipenem y tres a meropenem. Conclusión: las palanganas de baño de cama de acero inoxidable, descontaminadas para su reutilización con alcohol al 80% (p/v), después del lavado con agua corriente y detergente neutro, actúan como reservorios de patógenos hospitalarios. El uso de las palanganas de baño de cama no tendría consecuencias preocupantes para pacientes con la piel íntegra, pero para aquellos cuya piel no conserva su integridad y pensando en la contaminación de las manos de los profesionales, los resultados de esta investigación justifican la búsqueda de otros métodos de descontaminación o la adopción del baño de cama desechable.

COVID-19, alimentos y soluciones desinfectantes en el hogar / COVID-19, food and disinfecting solutions at home

Resumen El objetivo del presente trabajo en el contexto de la "pandemia COVID-19", pretende brindar recomendaciones y herramientas de utilidad basado en el análisis científico de diversos organismos referentes para la manipulación higiénica de los alimentos centrándose en las principales soluciones desinfectantes, en las concentraciones adecuadas y correcto modo de preparación. Para ello se consultó bibliografía actualizada al mes de mayo de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), Codex Alimentarius, la Dirección General de Salud y Seguridad Alimentaria de la Comisión Europea, Centro de Control y Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC), Ministerio de la Salud de la Nación Argentina. Se estableció la falta de evidencia hasta el momento que demuestre que el COVID-19 se transmite a través del consumo de alimentos, pero se remarcó la importancia de mantener las correctas prácticas de higiene alimentaria debido a la evidencia de la supervivencia de virus en las superficies y como parte de las medidas de prevención para cualquier otro tipo de Enfermedades Transmitida por Alimentos. Como herramienta principal para llevar adelante las buenas prácticas de higiene además del correcto lavado de manos, se establecieron las concentraciones adecuadas de los productos desinfectantes recomendados de fácil accesibilidad al consumidor y el modo de preparación de estos.

Abstract The objective of this work in the "pandemic context COVID-19", aims at providing recommendations and useful tools based on the scientific analysis of several reference bodies for the hygienic handling of food, focusing on the main disinfectant solutions taking into account adequate concentrations and correct way of preparation. In order to do this, updated bibliography was consulted as of May from the World Health Organization (WHO), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Codex Alimentarius, the General Directorate of Health and Food Safety of the European Commission, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Argentine Ministry of Health. What was established is that up to the moment there is lack of evidence to demonstrate that COVID-19 is transmitted through food consumption, but the importance of maintaining correct food hygiene practices due to the evidence of the survival of viruses on surfaces was highlighted, also as part of the prevention measures for any other type of Illness Transmitted by Food. As main tool to carry out good hygiene practices in addition to correct hand washing, the appropriate concentrations of the recommended disinfectant products with easy accessibility to the consumer and the way of preparing them were established.

Resistencia a desinfectantes y su relación con la resistencia a los antibióticos / Resistance to disinfectants and their relationship with antibiotic resistance

Resumen Objetivo: Sistematizar los principales mecanismos de acción de los desinfectantes y describir mecanismos de resistencia comunes entre biocidas y antibióticos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de artículos científicos entre 2000 y julio de 2019, sobre la relación entre la resistencia a biocidas y a los antibióticos, utilizando como palabras clave "antibiotic", "biocide", "resistance" y "bacteria", en las bases de datos PubMed y Google Scholar. Conclusiones: Existe numerosa evidencia científica que indica la relación entre bacterias resistentes a los desinfectantes y la adquisición de resistencia a los antibióticos, lo que implica un replanteamiento del uso de esas sustancias en diferentes contextos clínicos, con el fin de minimizar el impacto que puedan tener en la selección de microorganismos multirresistentes a los antibióticos.

Abstract Aim: To summarize the main mechanisms of action of disinfectants and to describe some common resistance mechanisms shared between biocides and antibiotics. Methods: A bibliographic review of scientific articles was carried out between 2000 and July 2019 on the relationship between resistance to biocides and antibiotics, using as keywords "antibiotic", "biocide", "resistance" and "bacteria" in the data bases of PubMed and Google Scholar. Conclusions: Numerous scientific studies indicate a relationship between disinfectant-resistant bacteria and the acquisition of antibiotic resistance. It is necessary to analyze the use of these substances in the clinical context in order to minimize the impact that they may have on the selection of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.

Environmental resistance of coronavirus and selection of disinfectant / 重庆医学

The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which started in Wuhan in December 2019, is a new infectious disease. The disease is highly contagious, and the correct selection of effective disinfectants is essential. This article analyzed the environmental resistance of coronavirus and its sensitivity to commonly used disinfectants by reviewing domestic and foreign literatures, and concluded that coronavirus has strong survivability in the environment, but it can be efficiently inactivated by most disinfectants. However, it should be noted that the commonly used concentration of chlorine-containing disinfectants (effective chlorine concentration of 500 mg/L) cannot quickly kill coronavirus, and a concentration of 1 000 mg/L or higher is required. Other biocidal agents, such as benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine digluconate, are less effective. This article aimed to provide references for selecting the appropriate disinfectants and disinfection methods to cut off the spread of the virus.

Study on the effect of chlorine disinfectants on the destruction of New coronavirus nucleic acid / 公共卫生与预防医学

Objective To observe the destructive effects of chlorine disinfectants on the nucleic acid of novel coronavirus, and to assess the feasibility of real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR technology for the evaluation of the disinfection effect of novel coronavirus. Methods A suspension quantitative inactivation test was used to observe the inactivation effects of different concentrations of chlorine containing disinfectants and different action times on the novel coronavirus. RT-PCR method was used to detect novel coronavirus nucleic acid for the disinfection effect evaluation. Results The chlorine disinfectants of 1 000 mg/L and 2 000 mg/L could destroy the nucleic acid of ew coronavirusafter application for over 30s. The chlorine disinfectant of 750 mg/L could destroy the nucleic acid of new coronavirusafter application for over 15min. Chlorine disinfectant of 500 mg/L could not completely destroy the nucleic acid of new coronavirusafter 30 min action. Conclusion The disinfection method stipulated in the national prevention and control plan using 1 000mg / L effective chlorine for the epidemic sites of new coronavirus for 30 minutes could completely destroy the nucleic acid of new coronavirus. The Real-time quantitative PCR can be used to evaluate the disinfection effect of new coronavirus.

Disinfection efficacy of peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ) on gastrointestinal endoscopy / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the disinfection efficacy of peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ ) on gastrointestinal endoscopy.@*Methods@#Endoscopes were disinfected respectively by 2% glutaraldehyde (GA group) and peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ ) (PAA group) according to the process by the 2016 version of "Regulation for cleaning and disinfection technique of flexible endoscope" , and then samples were collected through biopsy channel at the specified steps. The bacterial count and pathogenic bacteria of these samples were detected. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and Treponemia pallidum antibody (TP-Ab) were detected by chemiluminesent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) in the PAA group. The PAA group were continuously sampled for 5 days.@*Results@#A total of 56 gastroscopes and 16 colonoscopes were disinfected in the GA group, and 46 gastroscopes and 15 colonoscopes were disinfected in the PAA group. Compared with pre-disinfection, the bacterial count was both significantly reduced in the two groups after disinfection (P<0.05). The qualified rate of gastroscopes disinfection and total qualified rate of the PAA group were higher than those of the GA group [the qualified rate of gastroscopes: 97.83% (45/46) VS 92.86% (52/56), P>0.05; total qualified rate: 98.36% (60/61) VS 94.44% (68/72), P>0.05]. The qualified rate of colonoscopes in the two groups were both 100.00% (15/15, 16/16). After disinfecting by peracetic acid disinfectant (Type Ⅲ), HBsAg, anti-HCV and TP-Ab were negative. There were no significant differences on colonies number at different steps in a 5-day continuous sampling (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#Peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ) can provide a satisfied disinfectant effect, and be applied in clinic to meet the requests of high-level disinfection for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Disinfection efficacy of peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ) on gastrointestinal endoscopy / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To evaluate the disinfection efficacy of peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ ) on gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Endoscopes were disinfected respectively by 2％ glutaraldehyde (GA group)and peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ )(PAA group)according to the process by the 2016 version of "Regulation for cleaning and disinfection technique of flexible endoscope",and then samples were collected through biopsy channel at the specified steps. The bacterial count and pathogenic bacteria of these samples were detected. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg),hepatitis C virus (HCV)antibody and Treponemia pallidum antibody (TP-Ab) were detected by chemiluminesent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA)in the PAA group. The PAA group were continuously sampled for 5 days. Results A total of 56 gastroscopes and 16 colonoscopes were disinfected in the GA group,and 46 gastroscopes and 15 colonoscopes were disinfected in the PAA group. Compared with pre-disinfection,the bacterial count was both significantly reduced in the two groups after disinfection (P<0. 05). The qualified rate of gastroscopes disinfection and total qualified rate of the PAA group were higher than those of the GA group [the qualified rate of gastroscopes:97. 83％ (45/ 46)VS 92. 86％ (52/ 56),P>0. 05;total qualified rate:98. 36％ (60/ 61)VS 94. 44％ (68/ 72),P> 0. 05]. The qualified rate of colonoscopes in the two groups were both 100. 00％(15/ 15,16/ 16). After disinfecting by peracetic acid disinfectant (Type Ⅲ),HBsAg,anti-HCV and TP-Ab were negative. There were no significant differences on colonies number at different steps in a 5-day continuous sampling (P>0. 05). Conclusion Peracetic acid disinfectant (type Ⅲ)can provide a satisfied disinfectant effect,and be applied in clinic to meet the requests of high-level disinfection for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. under mono and dual-species conditions and their sensitivity to cetrimonium bromide, peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite

Abstract The aim of this study was evaluated the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. under mono and dual-species biofilms, onto stainless steel 316 (SS) and polypropylene B (PP), and their sensitivity to cetrimonium bromide, peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite. The biofilms were developed by immersion of the surfaces in TSB by 10 d at 37 °C. The results showed that in monospecies biofilms the type of surface not affected the cellular density (p > 0.05). However, in dual-species biofilms on PP the adhesion of Salmonella spp. was favored, 7.61 ± 0.13 Log10 CFU/cm2, compared with monospecies biofilms onto the same surface, 5.91 ± 0.44 Log10 CFU/cm2 (p < 0.05). The mono and dual-species biofilms were subjected to disinfection treatments; and the most effective disinfectant was peracetic acid (3500 ppm), reducing by more than 5 Log10 CFU/cm2, while the least effective was cetrimonium bromide. In addition, S. aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. were more resistant to the disinfectants in mono than in dual-species biofilms (p < 0.05). Therefore, the interspecies interactions between S. aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. had a negative effect on the antimicrobial resistance of each microorganism, compared with the monospecies biofilms.

A Comparative Evaluation Of Alternative Disinfectants To Decontaminate Tooth Brush

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection. Methods - 50 children of age grp 6-12yrs were included in the study. The new toothbrushes were given to children and were asked to brush in the morning and nigh for 1week under the supervision of parents. 2% chlorhexidine, 100% and 50% synthetic vinegar, 25% eucalyptus oil were tested. The head of both morning and night toothbrush were covered with sterile gauze and immediately transferred to microbiology department for microbial decontamination efficacy testing. Results :All disinfectant solutions used had equal antimicobial action for tooth brush disinfection. No difference in colonies or antimicrobial efficacy was seen between different disinfectants and morning and night toothbrush. Conclusion- These agents can be cost-effective, easily accessible, and comparatively effective for toothbrush disinfection. Because these agents are nontoxic, cost-effective and easily accessible, they may be appropriate for household use.

Determinación de la eficacia de los desinfectantes empleados en las áreas asépticas de un centro productor de biofarmacéuticos / Determination of the efficacy of the disinfectants employed in the aseptic areas at a biopharmaceuticals production center

En la industria biofarmacéutica, la desinfección se ha hecho parte fundamental de las actividades para controlar el nivel de microorganismos contaminantes que puedan llegar a comprometer la calidad del producto final. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la eficacia de los desinfectantes AniosSpecial DJP SF, Aniosurf Premium, Bacteranios SF, Aniospray 29, Aseptanios AD y Surfanios utilizados en la limpieza y desinfección del área aséptica de la Planta de Productos Parenterales 2 del Centro Nacional de Biopreparados (Mayabeque, Cuba). Se comprobó la eficacia con pruebas de desafío en superficies y en condiciones prácticas de uso. Se comparó estadísticamente el número de microorganismos aislados y la microbiota presente en el área antes y después del uso de los desinfectantes. Todos los desinfectantes cumplieron con los requisitos establecidos. Por lo tanto, se demostró su eficacia para realizar la limpieza de las áreas asépticas(AU)

In the biopharmaceutical industry, disinfection has become a fundamental part of the activities to control the level of contaminants microorganisms that could compromise the quality of the final product. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of the disinfectants Anios Special DJP SF, Aniosurf Premium, Bacteranios SF, Aniospray 29, Aseptanios AD and Surfanios for the cleaning and disinfection of the aseptic area at the Parenterals Products Plant 2 (PPP2) at the National Center for Bioproducts (Mayabeque, Cuba). The efficacy was checked with challenge tests in surfaces, in practical usage conditions. The number of isolated microorganisms and the microbiota present before and after use was compared statistically. All the disinfectants complied with the established requirements. Therefore, the efficacy of the disinfectants was demonstrated to perform the cleaning and disinfection of the aseptic areas(AU)